- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Moore, G. D.
- Articles by Grigliatti, T. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Moore, G. D.
- Articles by Grigliatti, T. A.
HISTONE GENE MULTIPLICITY AND POSITION EFFECT VARIEGATION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Gerald D. Moore 1, Donald A. Sinclair 1, and Thomas A. Grigliatti 1
1 Department of Zoology, The University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 2A9
The histone genes of wild-type Drosophila melanogaster are reiterated 100150 times per haploid genome and are located in the segment of chromosome 2 that corresponds to polytene bands 39D2-3 to E1-2. The influence of altered histone gene multiplicity on chromatin structure has been assayed by measuring modification of the gene inactivation associated with position effect variegation in genotypes bearing deletions of the 39D-E segment. The proportion of cells in which a variegating gene is active is increased in genotypes that are heterozygous for a deficiency that removes the histone gene complex. Deletions that remove segments adjacent to the histone gene complex have no effect on the expression of variegating genes. Suppression of position effect variegation associated with reduction of histone gene multiplicity applies to both X-linked and autosomal variegating genes. Position effects exerted by both autosomal and sex-chromosome heterochromatin were suppressible by deletions of the histone gene complex. The suppression was independent of the presence of the Y chromosome. A deficiency that deletes only the distal portion of the histone gene complex also has the ability to suppress position effect variegation. Duplication of the histone gene complex did not enhance position effect variegation. Deletion or duplication of the histone gene complex in the maternal genome had no effect on the extent of variegation in progeny whose histone gene multiplicity was normal. These results are discussed with respect to current knowledge of the organization of the histone gene complex and control of its expression.
Submitted on August 16, 1982Accepted on May 17, 1983
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. E. White, M. E. Leslie, B. R. Calvi, W. F. Marzluff, and R. J. Duronio Developmental and Cell Cycle Regulation of the Drosophila Histone Locus Body Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2007; 18(7): 2491 - 2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Fyodorov, M. D. Blower, G. H. Karpen, and J. T. Kadonaga Acf1 confers unique activities to ACF/CHRAC and promotes the formation rather than disruption of chromatin in vivo Genes & Dev., January 15, 2004; 18(2): 170 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Ner, M. J. Harrington, and T. A. Grigliatti A Role for the Drosophila SU(VAR)3-9 Protein in Chromatin Organization at the Histone Gene Cluster and in Suppression of Position-Effect Variegation Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1763 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Butler, S. Levine, X. Wang, S. Bonyadi, G. Fu, P. Lasko, B. Suter, and R. Doerig Map Position and Expression of the Genes in the 38 Region of Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2001; 158(4): 1597 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Weiler and B. T. Wakimoto Chromosome Rearrangements Induce Both Variegated and Reduced, Uniform Expression of Heterochromatic Genes in a Development-Specific Manner Genetics, July 1, 1998; 149(3): 1451 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kozlova, G. V. Pokholkova, G. Tzertzinis, J. D. Sutherland, I. F. Zhimulev, and F. C. Kafatos Drosophila Hormone Receptor 38 Functions in Metamorphosis: A Role in Adult Cuticle Formation Genetics, July 1, 1998; 149(3): 1465 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Bryk, M Banerjee, M Murphy, K E Knudsen, D J Garfinkel, and M J Curcio Transcriptional silencing of Ty1 elements in the RDN1 locus of yeast. Genes & Dev., January 15, 1997; 11(2): 255 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C D Clark-Adams, D Norris, M A Osley, J S Fassler, and F Winston Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes & Dev., February 1, 1988; 2(2): 150 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Berloco, L. Fanti, A. Breiling, V. Orlando, and S. Pimpinelli The maternal effect gene, abnormal oocyte (abo), of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a specific negative regulator of histones PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12126 - 12131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



