- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Clark, R. L.
- Articles by Sing, C. F.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Clark, R. L.
- Articles by Sing, C. F.
STUDIES OF ENZYME POLYMORPHISM IN THE KAMUELA POPULATION OF
DROSOPHILA MERCATORUM. III. EFFECTS OF VARIATION AT THE
GPD
LOCUS AND SUBFLIGHT STRESS ON THE ENERGY CHARGE AND GLYCOLYTIC INTERMEDIATE
CONCENTRATIONS
R. L. Clark 1, Eric Boerwinkle 1, G. J. Brewer 1, and C. F. Sing 1
1 Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48109
We have employed a "level crossing" strategy to study the primary
effects of an enzyme polymorphism in Drosophila mercatorum. This
strategy consists of following genetic differences across intervening phenotypes
to possible fitness effects. In this paper, we report the steady state concentrations
of the glycolytic intermediates and the adenylates (intervening phenotypes)
in two genotypes (
GPD-F,
GPD-S) at two stress levels
(rest, subflight). We did not detect a genotype or a genotype by stress interaction
effect on glycolytic intermediate or adenylate concentrations despite the
ability of the experimental design to detect a 20 to 50% difference from the
mean of a control. The flux of glycolysis is adequate to maintain the energy
charge in both strains under the stress levels considered. If there is a fitness
difference between these
GPD variants, it is unlikely to be
a result of modifications of glycolysis. Subflight stress, however, resulted
in an increase in metabolic flux. The observed pattern of intermediate concentration
differences is consistent with the modulation of glycolysis by the ratio of
the ATP and AMP concentrations acting on phosphofructokinase activity.
Accepted on March 28, 1983